Landmark Judgment on Best Evidence Rule 2023

Introduction In a riveting judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the principles of best evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, of 1872, specifically under Sections 91 and 92, were brought into the limelight. This case revolves around a dispute involving a tenant and the landlord over an agency-cum-license agreement that eventually led to a legal […]

Introduction to Video Conferencing Evidence Case

In today’s digital era, the intersection of technology and law opens up new avenues for legal procedures. One such groundbreaking instance is the consideration of evidence via video conferencing in a court of law. This editorial delves into a significant case that posed vital questions regarding the admissibility of evidence presented through video conferencing under […]

Evidence and Conspiracy: A Landmark Judgment

Introduction In the realm of legal intricacies, the interpretation of Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, often stirs debate. This editorial delves into a pivotal case where the crux was whether a statement made by a co-conspirator is admissible under this section. The case in question unraveled a conspiracy to manufacture bombs illegally, […]

Understanding Co-Conspirator Statements: A Landmark Judgment

Introduction In the realm of legal intricacies, understanding the nuances of statements made by co-conspirators is pivotal. This editorial delves into a landmark judgment that sheds light on the admissibility of such statements under the framework of the Indian Evidence Act, of 1872, specifically Section 10. The case in focus involves two accused individuals embroiled […]

Landmark Judgment on Evidence Admissibility

Introduction In a pivotal judgment exploring the intricacies of evidence law, the Supreme Court delved into the nuances of evidence admissibility. This case, presided over by Justices H.R. Khanna, R.S. Sarkaria, and V.R. Krishna Iyer, with the judgment delivered by Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, hinges on a property dispute reaching the apex court. The crux […]

Unraveling a Landmark Judgment: Conspiracy Theories in 2023

Introduction In a riveting case exploring human emotions and legal interpretations, the conspiracy under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, of 1872, takes center stage. The case intricately examines the boundaries of “common intention” as outlined in the Act through the actions of a wife and her paramour, accused of orchestrating the murder of […]

Examining the Interplay: Marital Fidelity Case

Introduction In a landmark judgment that scrutinizes the interplay between legal presumptions and scientific advancements, the Supreme Court delved into the complexities surrounding the presumption of a child’s legitimacy under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act of 1872. This case emerges against the backdrop of a matrimonial dispute, where the husband sought to challenge […]

Defamation and Privilege: Verghese vs. Ponnan 1969

Introduction In the heart of a family dispute lies the case of Verghese vs. Ponnan, a landmark judgment that explores the fine line between defamation and privileged communication within the sanctity of marriage. This case unfolded when T.J. Ponnan sent several letters to his wife, which were later alleged to contain defamatory statements about her […]

Landmark Judgment: Aghnoo Nagesia Case 1966

Introduction In the heart of Indian judiciary history, the Aghnoo Nagesia case of 1966 stands as a cornerstone, clarifying the evidentiary value of confessionary statements in the eyes of the law. This case delves deep into the intricacies of Sections 25, 26, and 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, unraveling the legal stance on […]

Understanding Estoppel: A Landmark Judgment

Introduction Estoppel is a legal principle preventing someone from arguing something contrary to a claim they have previously made or accepted by their actions. In a pivotal judgment, the Supreme Court delved into the intricacies of estoppel, emphasizing that knowledge of facts by both parties negates its application. This case underscored that estoppel cannot be […]